Consider the following comparative analytical statements regarding the concept of Self or Soul in early heterodox traditions:
1. The Buddhist Anatta (No-Self) doctrine argues that the individual is merely a temporary cluster of five changing aggregates (Skandhas) with no underlying essence.
2. The Jaina Jiva-vada asserts that every sentient entity possesses a permanent, individual, and eternal spiritual substance capable of attaining omniscience.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Question

Accepted Answer

Both statements track the fundamental divide in Indian metaphysics. Buddhism rejects any unchanging ego (Anatmavada), viewing the person as a causal stream of mental-physical events. Jainism is explicitly pluralistic and animistic, positing that infinite Jivas exist, each eternal and capable of purifying itself through ascetic effort, thereby reaching the absolute state of Kevala Jnana.

Answer

Answer