In which of the following landmark cases did the Supreme Court of India rule that the Parliament has no power to amend any of the provisions of Part III (Fundamental Rights) of the Constitution?

Explanation

In the landmark judgment of Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967), the Supreme Court ruled that Fundamental Rights contained in Part III of the Constitution are given a transcendental and immutable position, meaning Parliament has no authority to curtail or take away these rights through constitutional amendments.